Gas Prices and Fuel Efficiency
Thursday, November 23, 2006 | 1:34:00 PM
Most Americans want 40 mpg legislation. Sure it's a noble statement, but hardly realistic at the moment.
Right now, very very few cars are above 40 mpg. I took a quick peek at the Toyota website and only the Camry Hybrid and Prius are above 40. The Prius is well above and the Camry is only just at 40; its highway mpg is actually 38, even. Basically, we'll be stuck driving one of those two cars out of their 7 total cars and no trucks, vans, or SUVs.
There was earlier a legislation to give compensation for drivers who bought a hybrid vehicle. The Highlander hybrid (an SUV) actually has worse mpg than the corolla. People got compensation for getting a vehicle with lower fuel efficiency.
Many people own SUVs also. So there's a bit of hypocrisy with people wanting cheaper gas, but not willing to give up their gas guzzlers.
Prop 87 was also defeated in the election earlier this month. It would tax the oil companies and use the money to find alternative energy sources. The oil companies spent a lot on advertising to convince people that it would only raise gas prices. Part of the legislation is that gas companies are banned from increasing gas prices as a direct result from this. They'll probably find some way to raise it anyway, but now they also have to pay for the advertising money.
People vote for their pocketbook in the immediate future, not thinking about the greater effect or the feasibility. So we want to make a standard that only 5% of our vehicles currently pass to make things more efficient, but we won't try to look for alternative energy sources because it might make us pay a bit more until we do find it?
So we want the challenge of making cars more efficient rather than the fuel less expensive. And 40 mpg is ridiculously high with the cars currently available. It takes trucks and large vehicles pretty much off the road.
Comments (1)